Home › Criteria
Registry · v1AI Posture criterion IRIs
https://aiposture.org/criteria/v1/
Stable test criterion IRIs for the AI Posture EARL v0 wire format. One IRI per vector per maturity level. Level 0 (N/A) is a falsifiable scope boundary defined in the specification, not a test criterion, and has no IRI.
These IRIs are stable. A criterion is never re-minted; a superseded criterion is replaced by a new IRI under a new namespace version, and the old IRI continues to resolve to its original meaning. The machine-readable registry is at index.json.
People
| Level | Name | Assertion |
|---|---|---|
| L1 | Perceiving | Our people use AI. We have not measured how. |
| L2 | Assessing | We have looked at how our people collaborate with AI. |
| L3 | Integrating | What we saw changed what we do. |
| L4 | Calibrating | We measure continuously. Data drives governance. |
| L5 | Engineering | Human-AI collaboration is an engineered capability, continuously maintained. |
Infrastructure
| Level | Name | Assertion |
|---|---|---|
| L1 | Perceiving | Agents may interact with our systems. We have not measured readiness. |
| L2 | Assessing | We have scanned our infrastructure for agent readiness. |
| L3 | Integrating | We have acted on what the scan showed. |
| L4 | Calibrating | We scan continuously. Drift is tracked. |
| L5 | Engineering | Agent-readiness is engineered into how systems are built and shipped. |
Regulation
| Level | Name | Assertion |
|---|---|---|
| L1 | Perceiving | We are exposed to AI regulation. We have not mapped it. |
| L2 | Assessing | We have mapped our obligations across jurisdictions. |
| L3 | Integrating | Obligations are translated into controls. |
| L4 | Calibrating | Controls cover all in-scope jurisdictions. Regulatory change is monitored. |
| L5 | Engineering | Compliance is continuous. New jurisdictions onboard rapidly. |
Use in EARL
Each criterion IRI is the earl:test of an earl:Assertion. See the profile and example for usage.